DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 RAM 1500 vs 2015 Toyota Highlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

RAM 1500

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RAMMakeToyota
1500ModelHighlander
2013Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5-6Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3604 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
305 HPPower280 HP
364 NmTorque337 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
98 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
8Gears—
265/70 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

6043 mmLength4865 mm
—Width1925 mm
1965 mmHeight1730 mm
—Weight2205 Kg
3795 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 RAM 1500 and 2015 Toyota Highlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, RAM 1500 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…