DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Jeep Wrangler vs 2013 RAM 1500 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

RAM 1500

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeRAM
WranglerModel1500
2015Model year2013
SUVBody typePick-up
4Seats5-6
3Doors4

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3604 ccEngine displacement3604 cc
280 HPPower305 HP
342 NmTorque364 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank98 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears8
245/75 R17Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4223 mmLength6043 mm
1873 mmWidth—
1840 mmHeight1965 mm
1753 KgWeight—
2424 mmWheelbase3795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Jeep Wrangler and 2013 RAM 1500 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, RAM 1500 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…