2013 • RAM
1500
RAM 1500 3.6 Pentastar V6 (305 Hp) 2013Overall Score78.75/100
2013 RAM 1500 vs 2015 Mazda CX-9 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Mazda
CX-9
Mazda CX-9 3.7 V6 (273 Hp) 2015Overall Score78.5/100
WINNER
RAM 1500
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
RAM 1500SpecificationMazda CX-9
RAMMakeMazda
1500ModelCX-9
2013Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5-6Seats7
4Doors5
Performance
RAM 1500SpecificationMazda CX-9
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3604 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
305 HPPower273 HP
364 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
RAM 1500SpecificationMazda CX-9
PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank76 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
RAM 1500SpecificationMazda CX-9
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
265/70 R17Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
RAM 1500SpecificationMazda CX-9
6043 mmLength5232 mm
—Width1935 mm
1965 mmHeight1727 mm
—Weight1958 Kg
3795 mmWheelbase2875 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 RAM 1500 and 2015 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, RAM 1500 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableJeep Wrangler vs RAM 15002015 and 2013 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableInfiniti QX50 vs RAM 15002015 and 2013 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Highlander vs RAM 15002015 and 2013 model years
VSImage unavailablePorsche Boxster vs RAM 15002012 and 2013 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMazda CX-9 vs RAM 15002015 and 2013 model yearsComments are loading…