2013 • RAM
1500
RAM 1500 3.6 Pentastar V6 (305 Hp) 2013Overall Score78.75/100
2013 RAM 1500 vs 2015 Jeep Wrangler Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 3.6i V6 12V Sahara (280 Hp) 2015Overall Score78.5/100
WINNER
RAM 1500
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
RAM 1500SpecificationJeep Wrangler
RAMMakeJeep
1500ModelWrangler
2013Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5-6Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
RAM 1500SpecificationJeep Wrangler
—0–100 km/h8,1 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3604 ccEngine displacement3604 cc
305 HPPower280 HP
364 NmTorque342 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
RAM 1500SpecificationJeep Wrangler
PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption15,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,8 lt
—Average consumption11,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
RAM 1500SpecificationJeep Wrangler
6043 mmLength4223 mm
—Width1873 mm
1965 mmHeight1840 mm
—Weight1753 Kg
3795 mmWheelbase2424 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 RAM 1500 and 2015 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, RAM 1500 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableJeep Wrangler vs RAM 15002015 and 2013 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableInfiniti QX50 vs RAM 15002015 and 2013 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Highlander vs RAM 15002015 and 2013 model years
VSImage unavailablePorsche Boxster vs RAM 15002012 and 2013 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMazda CX-9 vs RAM 15002015 and 2013 model yearsComments are loading…