DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Proton Exora vs 2010 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ProtonMakeCitroen
ExoraModelC3
2010Model year2010
MPVBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
126 HPPower112 HP
150 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption5,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4592 mmLength3941 mm
1809 mmWidth1728 mm
1691 mmHeight1524 mm
1400-1420 KgWeight1090 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Proton Exora and 2010 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…