DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mini Hatch vs 2010 Proton Exora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Hatch

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeProton
HatchModelExora
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeMPV
4Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
110 HPPower126 HP
240 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank0 lt
4,7 ltUrban consumption—
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/65 R15 84HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3709 mmLength4592 mm
1683 mmWidth1809 mm
1407 mmHeight1691 mm
1090 KgWeight1400-1420 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mini Hatch and 2010 Proton Exora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Hatch leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…