DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Audi TT vs 2012 Audi RS 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi RS 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

95.5–96.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationAudi RS 3
AudiMakeAudi
TTModelRS 3
2015Model year2012
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationAudi RS 3
4,9 s0–100 km/h4,6 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2480 cc
310 HPPower340 HP
380 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationAudi RS 3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationAudi RS 3
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears7 S tronic
245/40 R18Tyre size225/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationAudi RS 3
4191 mmLength4302 mm
1832 mmWidth1794 mm
1343 mmHeight1402 mm
1365 KgWeight1575 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Audi TT and 2012 Audi RS 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi RS 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…