E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi RS 3 vs 2015 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi RS 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

96.5–95.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi RS 3SpecificationAudi TT
AudiMakeAudi
RS 3ModelTT
2012Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Audi RS 3SpecificationAudi TT
4,6 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2480 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
340 HPPower310 HP
450 NmTorque380 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi RS 3SpecificationAudi TT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi RS 3SpecificationAudi TT
4x4Drivetrain4x4
7 S tronicGears6
225/35 R19Tyre size245/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi RS 3SpecificationAudi TT
4302 mmLength4191 mm
1794 mmWidth1832 mm
1402 mmHeight1343 mm
1575 KgWeight1365 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi RS 3 and 2015 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi RS 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVSImage unavailableAudi TT vs Audi RS 32015 and 2012 model years

Comments are loading…