DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Audi TT vs 2017 Jaguar F-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

93.5–92.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeJaguar
TTModelF-type
2014Model year2017
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

4,9 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
310 HPPower300 HP
380 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
245/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4191 mmLength4482 mm
1832 mmWidth1923 mm
1343 mmHeight1307 mm
1365 KgWeight1545 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2622 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Audi TT and 2017 Jaguar F-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…