2017 • Jaguar
F-type
Jaguar F-type 2.0 (300 Hp) 2017Overall Score92.5/100
2017 Jaguar F-type vs 2014 Audi TT Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Audi
TT
Audi TT TTS 2.0 TFSI (310 Hp) 2014Overall Score93.5/100
WINNER
Audi TT
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jaguar F-typeSpecificationAudi TT
JaguarMakeAudi
F-typeModelTT
2017Model year2014
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Jaguar F-typeSpecificationAudi TT
5,7 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
300 HPPower310 HP
400 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Jaguar F-typeSpecificationAudi TT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Jaguar F-typeSpecificationAudi TT
4482 mmLength4191 mm
1923 mmWidth1832 mm
1307 mmHeight1343 mm
1545 KgWeight1365 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2505 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Jaguar F-type and 2014 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableVolvo S90 vs Jaguar F-type2017 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableVolvo V60 vs Jaguar F-type2018 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableAriel Atom vs Jaguar F-type2018 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableVolvo S60 vs Jaguar F-type2019 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Focus vs Jaguar F-type2017 and 2017 model yearsComments are loading…