DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Audi TT vs 2004 Cadillac SRX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

87.5–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationCadillac SRX
AudiMakeCadillac
TTModelSRX
2005Model year2004
CoupeBody typeEstate
2+2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationCadillac SRX
6,5 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3189 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
250 HPPower255 HP
320 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationCadillac SRX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationCadillac SRX
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size235/65 R17; 255/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationCadillac SRX
4041 mmLength4950 mm
1764 mmWidth1845 mm
1346 mmHeight1670 mm
1490 KgWeight1960 Kg
2422 mmWheelbase2957 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Audi TT and 2004 Cadillac SRX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…