DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2005 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeAudi
Range RoverModelTT
2007Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
200 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3628 ccEngine displacement3189 cc
272 HPPower250 HP
640 NmTorque320 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank62 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
255/60 R18Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4972 mmLength4041 mm
1956 mmWidth1764 mm
1902 mmHeight1346 mm
2635 KgWeight1490 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2422 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Land Rover Range Rover and 2005 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…