DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi TT vs 2016 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationJaguar XF
AudiMakeJaguar
TTModelXF
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationJaguar XF
6,0 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
250 km/hTop speed241 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
230 HPPower240 HP
370 NmTorque500 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationJaguar XF
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank66 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationJaguar XF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
225/50 R17Tyre size245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationJaguar XF
4177 mmLength4955 mm
1832 mmWidth1987 mm
1353 mmHeight1496 mm
1230 KgWeight1805 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2960 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi TT and 2016 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…