DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW X5 vs 2016 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X5SpecificationAudi TT
BMWMakeAudi
X5ModelTT
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCoupe
5/7Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

BMW X5SpecificationAudi TT
7,7 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
231 HPPower230 HP
500 NmTorque370 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X5SpecificationAudi TT
DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X5SpecificationAudi TT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8 SteptronicGears6
255/55 R18; 255/50 R19; 285/45 R19; 275/40 R20; 315/35 R20Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X5SpecificationAudi TT
4886 mmLength4177 mm
1938 mmWidth1832 mm
1762 mmHeight1353 mm
1995 KgWeight1230 Kg
2933 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW X5 and 2016 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…