DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Audi TT vs 2015 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
AudiMakeKTM
TTModelX-Bow
2014Model year2015
CoupeBody typeRoadster
4Seats2
2Doors—

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
6,0 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
250 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
230 HPPower240 HP
370 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
4177 mmLength3738 mm
1832 mmWidth1915 mm
1353 mmHeight1202 mm
1230 KgWeight790 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Audi TT and 2015 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…