DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 KTM X-Bow vs 2014 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi TT
KTMMakeAudi
X-BowModelTT
2015Model year2014
RoadsterBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
—Doors2

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi TT
3,9 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
240 HPPower230 HP
310 NmTorque370 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi TT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi TT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size225/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi TT
3738 mmLength4177 mm
1915 mmWidth1832 mm
1202 mmHeight1353 mm
790 KgWeight1230 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 KTM X-Bow and 2014 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…