DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi TT vs 2016 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationFord Mondeo
AudiMakeFord
TTModelMondeo
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationFord Mondeo
6,7 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
234 km/hTop speed233 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
184 HPPower210 HP
380 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationFord Mondeo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationFord Mondeo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 S tronicGears6 PowerShift
225/50 R17; 245/45 R17; 245/40 R18; 245/35 R19; 255/30 R20Tyre size215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationFord Mondeo
4177 mmLength4871 mm
1832 mmWidth1852 mm
1353 mmHeight1482 mm
1375 KgWeight1525 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi TT and 2016 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…