DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2016 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi TT
FordMakeAudi
MondeoModelTT
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi TT
7,9 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
233 km/hTop speed234 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
210 HPPower184 HP
450 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi TT
DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi TT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 PowerShiftGears6 S tronic
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size225/50 R17; 245/45 R17; 245/40 R18; 245/35 R19; 255/30 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi TT
4871 mmLength4177 mm
1852 mmWidth1832 mm
1482 mmHeight1353 mm
1525 KgWeight1375 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Mondeo and 2016 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…