DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi TT vs 2016 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo XC70
AudiMakeVolvo
TTModelXC70
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo XC70
6,9 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
241 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
180 HPPower181 HP
250 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo XC70
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo XC70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo XC70
4177 mmLength4838 mm
1832 mmWidth1870 mm
1353 mmHeight1604 mm
1210 KgWeight—
2505 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi TT and 2016 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…