DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi TT vs 2016 Ford Edge Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Edge

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationFord Edge
AudiMakeFord
TTModelEdge
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationFord Edge
6,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
241 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
180 HPPower180 HP
250 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationFord Edge
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationFord Edge
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size235/55 R19; 255/45 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationFord Edge
4177 mmLength4808 mm
1832 mmWidth1928 mm
1353 mmHeight1707 mm
1210 KgWeight1838 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2849 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi TT and 2016 Ford Edge approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Edge leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…