DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Audi TT vs 2005 Toyota Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
TTModelMatrix
2004Model year2005
CoupeBody typeEstate
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h—
228 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
180 HPPower183 HP
235 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4041 mmLength4350 mm
1764 mmWidth1775 mm
1346 mmHeight1540 mm
1280 KgWeight1270 Kg
2422 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Audi TT and 2005 Toyota Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…