DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2004 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Outlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
OutlanderModelTT
2004Model year2004
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

7,7 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
220 km/hTop speed228 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
202 HPPower180 HP
303 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
10 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/55 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4550 mmLength4041 mm
1750 mmWidth1764 mm
1620 mmHeight1346 mm
1595 KgWeight1280 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2422 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2004 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Outlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…