DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Audi TT vs 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Outlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
TTModelOutlander
2004Model year2004
CoupeBody typeSUV
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h7,7 s
228 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
180 HPPower202 HP
235 NmTorque303 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4041 mmLength4550 mm
1764 mmWidth1750 mm
1346 mmHeight1620 mm
1280 KgWeight1595 Kg
2422 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Audi TT and 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Outlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…