E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Audi TT vs 1999 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationBMW Z3
AudiMakeBMW
TTModelZ3
2000Model year1999
RoadsterBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationBMW Z3
8,9 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
214 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
210 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank51 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationBMW Z3
4041 mmLength4050 mm
1764 mmWidth1740 mm
1349 mmHeight1293 mm
1340 KgWeight1270 Kg
2422 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Audi TT and 1999 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2000 Audi A3VSImage unavailableAudi A3 vs Audi TT2000 and 2000 model years2000 Audi A4VSImage unavailableAudi A4 vs Audi TT2000 and 2000 model years1999 Audi A6VSImage unavailableAudi A6 vs Audi TT1999 and 2000 model years2000 Caterham SevenVSImage unavailableCaterham Seven vs Audi TT2000 and 2000 model years1999 BMW Z3VSImage unavailableBMW Z3 vs Audi TT1999 and 2000 model years

Comments are loading…