DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationAudi TT
BMWMakeAudi
Z3ModelTT
1999Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeRoadster
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationAudi TT
8,9 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
210 km/hTop speed214 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
280 NmTorque210 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationAudi TT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank55 lt
13 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationAudi TT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationAudi TT
4050 mmLength4041 mm
1740 mmWidth1764 mm
1293 mmHeight1349 mm
1270 KgWeight1340 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2422 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 BMW Z3 and 2000 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…