DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Peugeot 406 vs 1998 Mazda Bongo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 406

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeMazda
406ModelBongo
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeMinivan
4+1Seats—
4Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower71 HP
201 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank48 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4715 mmLength4230 mm
1760 mmWidth1630 mm
1450 mmHeight1970 mm
2700 mmWheelbase2220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Peugeot 406 and 1998 Mazda Bongo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 406 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…