2016 • Audi
S3
Audi S3 2.0 TFSI (310 Hp) 2016Overall Score89.5/100
2016 Audi S3 vs 2017 Jaguar F-Pace Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Jaguar
F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t (300 Hp) 2017Overall Score88.75/100
WINNER
Audi S3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
89.5–88.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi S3SpecificationJaguar F-Pace
AudiMakeJaguar
S3ModelF-Pace
2016Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Audi S3SpecificationJaguar F-Pace
5,2 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
250 km/hTop speed233 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
310 HPPower300 HP
380 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi S3SpecificationJaguar F-Pace
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi S3SpecificationJaguar F-Pace
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears8
225/40 R18; 245/40 R18; 235/35 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi S3SpecificationJaguar F-Pace
4252 mmLength4746 mm
1777 mmWidth2070 mm
1401 mmHeight1667 mm
1405 KgWeight1770 Kg
2596 mmWheelbase2874 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Audi S3 and 2017 Jaguar F-Pace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi S3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…