2017 • Jaguar
F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t (300 Hp) 2017Overall Score88.75/100
2017 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2016 Audi S3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Audi
S3
Audi S3 2.0 TFSI (310 Hp) 2016Overall Score89.5/100
WINNER
Audi S3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
88.75–89.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationAudi S3
JaguarMakeAudi
F-PaceModelS3
2017Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationAudi S3
6,0 s0–100 km/h5,2 s
233 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
300 HPPower310 HP
400 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationAudi S3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationAudi S3
4x4Drivetrain4x4
8Gears6
—Tyre size225/40 R18; 245/40 R18; 235/35 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationAudi S3
4746 mmLength4252 mm
2070 mmWidth1777 mm
1667 mmHeight1401 mm
1770 KgWeight1405 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2596 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Jaguar F-Pace and 2016 Audi S3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi S3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…