DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Peugeot 307 vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Peugeot 307SpecificationMG ZR
PeugeotMakeMG
307ModelZR
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

Peugeot 307SpecificationMG ZR
9,2 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
205 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
136 HPPower113 HP
190 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Peugeot 307SpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Peugeot 307SpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Peugeot 307SpecificationMG ZR
4202 mmLength4011 mm
1730 mmWidth1690 mm
1510 mmHeight1400 mm
1202 KgWeight1155 Kg
2608 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Peugeot 307 and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…