1996 • Audi
RS 2
Audi RS 2 2.2i (315 Hp) 1996Overall Score86.5/100
1996 Audi RS 2 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 T (280 Hp) 2000Overall Score85.5/100
WINNER
Audi RS 2
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
86.5–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi RS 2SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
AudiMakeMitsubishi
RS 2ModelLancer
1996Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Audi RS 2SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
5,4 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
262 km/hTop speed260 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
315 HPPower280 HP
410 NmTorque383 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi RS 2SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank50 lt
17 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi RS 2SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears4
245/40 R17Tyre size225/45 ZR17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi RS 2SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4510 mmLength4350 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1386 mmHeight1415 mm
1595 KgWeight1280 Kg
2597 mmWheelbase2510 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Audi RS 2 and 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi RS 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…