DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 1996 Audi RS 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi RS 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

85.5–86.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
LancerModelRS 2
2000Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

4,9 s0–100 km/h5,4 s
260 km/hTop speed262 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2226 cc
280 HPPower315 HP
383 NmTorque410 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption17 lt
—Average consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears6
225/45 ZR17Tyre size245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4510 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1415 mmHeight1386 mm
1280 KgWeight1595 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2597 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Lancer and 1996 Audi RS 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi RS 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…