DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Perodua Nippa vs 1999 Smart Fortwo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Nippa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeSmart
NippaModelFortwo
2002Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats2
5Doors3

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
132 km/hTop speed135 km/h
659 ccEngine displacement698 cc
31 HPPower50 HP
49 NmTorque80 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank33 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
145/70 R12Tyre size145/65 R15; 175/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength2500 mm
1395 mmWidth1515 mm
1410 mmHeight1549 mm
650 KgWeight805 Kg
2280 mmWheelbase1812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Perodua Nippa and 1999 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Nippa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…