DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Vectra vs 2003 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Vectra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeLand Rover
VectraModelRange Rover
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
226 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2958 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
177 HPPower177 HP
370 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank100 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
7 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/55 R16Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4596 mmLength4950 mm
1798 mmWidth1955 mm
1460 mmHeight1860 mm
1613 KgWeight2500 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Vectra and 2003 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Vectra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…