DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2003 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Vectra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeOpel
Range RoverModelVectra
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
179 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2958 cc
177 HPPower177 HP
390 NmTorque370 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
100 ltFuel tank61 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
255/55 R19Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4596 mm
1955 mmWidth1798 mm
1860 mmHeight1460 mm
2500 KgWeight1613 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Range Rover and 2003 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Vectra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…