2014 • Audi
Q7
Audi Q7 3.0 TDI V6 (204 Hp) 2014Overall Score81.75/100
2014 Audi Q7 vs 2016 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 Hp) 2016Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi Q7SpecificationFord Ranger
AudiMakeFord
Q7ModelRanger
2014Model year2016
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Audi Q7SpecificationFord Ranger
9,1 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement3198 cc
204 HPPower200 HP
450 NmTorque470 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Audi Q7SpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typeDiesel
100 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi Q7SpecificationFord Ranger
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8 TiptronicGears6
235/60 R18Tyre size215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi Q7SpecificationFord Ranger
5089 mmLength5277-5354 mm
1983 mmWidth1860 mm
1737 mmHeight1815 mm
2270 KgWeight1883 Kg
3002 mmWheelbase3220 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Audi Q7 and 2016 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…