2016 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 Hp) 2016Overall Score82.5/100
2016 Ford Ranger vs 2014 Audi Q7 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Audi
Q7
Audi Q7 3.0 TDI V6 (204 Hp) 2014Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationAudi Q7
FordMakeAudi
RangerModelQ7
2016Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationAudi Q7
—0–100 km/h9,1 s
175 km/hTop speed202 km/h
3198 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
200 HPPower204 HP
470 NmTorque450 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationAudi Q7
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationAudi Q7
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8 Tiptronic
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size235/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationAudi Q7
5277-5354 mmLength5089 mm
1860 mmWidth1983 mm
1815 mmHeight1737 mm
1883 KgWeight2270 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase3002 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Ranger and 2014 Audi Q7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…