2003 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 3.2 V6 (218 Hp) 2003Overall Score68.5/100
2003 Opel Omega vs 2012 Volkswagen Jetta Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volkswagen
Jetta
Volkswagen Jetta 1.6 (105 Hp) 2012Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 14.25 points.
68.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationVolkswagen Jetta
OpelMakeVolkswagen
OmegaModelJetta
2003Model year2012
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationVolkswagen Jetta
9,5 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
232 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3175 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
218 HPPower105 HP
290 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationVolkswagen Jetta
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
16,9 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
11,9 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationVolkswagen Jetta
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationVolkswagen Jetta
4898 mmLength4644 mm
1776 mmWidth1778 mm
1540 mmHeight1482 mm
1733 KgWeight1392 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2651 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Opel Omega and 2012 Volkswagen Jetta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 14.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…