DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Oldsmobile Aurora vs 2003 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeOpel
AuroraModelOmega
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed232 km/h
3473 ccEngine displacement3175 cc
218 HPPower218 HP
312 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption16,9 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption11,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5060 mmLength4898 mm
1850 mmWidth1776 mm
1440 mmHeight1540 mm
1645 KgWeight1733 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Oldsmobile Aurora and 2003 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…