DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Omega vs 2003 BMW 5 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 4 points.

68.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeBMW
OmegaModel5 Serisi
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
232 km/hTop speed206 km/h
3175 ccEngine displacement1951 cc
218 HPPower136 HP
290 NmTorque280 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
16,9 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
11,9 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4775 mm
1776 mmWidth1800 mm
1540 mmHeight1435 mm
1733 KgWeight1490 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Omega and 2003 BMW 5 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 4 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…