DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Omega vs 1996 Acura SLX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura SLX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationAcura SLX
OpelMakeAcura
OmegaModelSLX
1994Model year1996
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationAcura SLX
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
222 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2969 ccEngine displacement3165 cc
177 HPPower177 HP
240 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationAcura SLX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank85 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,1 ltAverage consumption16 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationAcura SLX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size216/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationAcura SLX
4770 mmLength4740 mm
1760 mmWidth1750 mm
1480 mmHeight1840 mm
1460 KgWeight1880 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Omega and 1996 Acura SLX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura SLX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…