DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Acura SLX vs 1994 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura SLX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura SLXSpecificationOpel Omega
AcuraMakeOpel
SLXModelOmega
1996Model year1994
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Acura SLXSpecificationOpel Omega
10,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
165 km/hTop speed222 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement2969 cc
177 HPPower177 HP
260 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Acura SLXSpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption15,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
16 ltAverage consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura SLXSpecificationOpel Omega
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
216/80 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura SLXSpecificationOpel Omega
4740 mmLength4770 mm
1750 mmWidth1760 mm
1840 mmHeight1480 mm
1880 KgWeight1460 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Acura SLX and 1994 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura SLX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…