DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Omega vs 1994 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeLand Rover
OmegaModelRange Rover
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
210 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2969 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
156 HPPower136 HP
230 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4713 mm
1760 mmWidth1853 mm
1445 mmHeight1817 mm
1415 KgWeight2115 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Omega and 1994 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…