DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Volvo 940 vs 1994 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
VolvoMakeOpel
940ModelOmega
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
9,6 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
190 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2849 ccEngine displacement2969 cc
170 HPPower156 HP
240 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
3Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
4871 mmLength4740 mm
1750 mmWidth1760 mm
1411 mmHeight1445 mm
1475 KgWeight1415 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Volvo 940 and 1994 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…