2002 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.6 V6 (180 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 Chrysler Concorde Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Chrysler
Concorde
Chrysler Concorde 2.7 i V6 24V (203 Hp) 2002Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
Chrysler Concorde
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Concorde
OpelMakeChrysler
OmegaModelConcorde
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Concorde
9,5 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
229 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2597 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
180 HPPower203 HP
240 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Concorde
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Concorde
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Concorde
4898 mmLength5310 mm
1776 mmWidth1900 mm
1455 mmHeight1420 mm
1610 KgWeight1570 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2870 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Opel Omega and 2002 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…