DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chrysler Concorde vs 2002 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeOpel
ConcordeModelOmega
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
187 km/hTop speed229 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2597 cc
203 HPPower180 HP
258 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4898 mm
1900 mmWidth1776 mm
1420 mmHeight1455 mm
1570 KgWeight1610 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chrysler Concorde and 2002 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…