DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 1999 Toyota Crown Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeToyota
OmegaModelCrown
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
229 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2597 ccEngine displacement2491 cc
180 HPPower180 HP
240 NmTorque235 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank64 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears—
205/65 R15Tyre size185/75 SR14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4690 mm
1776 mmWidth1695 mm
1455 mmHeight1515 mm
1610 KgWeight1500 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 1999 Toyota Crown approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…