2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.6 V6 (180 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 2.5 i V6 24V (177 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
OpelMakeLand Rover
OmegaModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
9,5 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
229 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2597 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
180 HPPower177 HP
240 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4898 mmLength4433 mm
1776 mmWidth1809 mm
1455 mmHeight1709 mm
1610 KgWeight1550 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…