DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Opel Omega vs 1990 Audi 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.5–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 90
OpelMakeAudi
OmegaModel90
1990Model year1990
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 90
11,5 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
240 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2594 ccEngine displacement2309 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
220 NmTorque189 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,5 ltUrban consumption—
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 90
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears3
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 90
4770 mmLength4393 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1480 mmHeight1397 mm
1460 KgWeight1170 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Opel Omega and 1990 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…