1990 • Audi
200
Audi 200 2.4 (136 Hp) 1990Overall Score60.5/100
1990 Audi 200 vs 1990 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.6 i (150 Hp) 1990Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
60.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 200SpecificationOpel Omega
AudiMakeOpel
200ModelOmega
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Audi 200SpecificationOpel Omega
—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2393 ccEngine displacement2594 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
0 NmTorque220 Nm
—Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 200SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,9 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 200SpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 200SpecificationOpel Omega
4807 mmLength4770 mm
1814 mmWidth1760 mm
1422 mmHeight1480 mm
1290 KgWeight1460 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Audi 200 and 1990 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…