1990 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.6 i (150 Hp) 1990Overall Score61.5/100
1990 Opel Omega vs 1990 Audi 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Audi
200
Audi 200 2.4 (136 Hp) 1990Overall Score60.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.5–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 200
OpelMakeAudi
OmegaModel200
1990Model year1990
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 200
11,5 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2594 ccEngine displacement2393 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
220 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,5 ltUrban consumption—
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 200
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 200
4770 mmLength4807 mm
1760 mmWidth1814 mm
1480 mmHeight1422 mm
1460 KgWeight1290 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2687 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Opel Omega and 1990 Audi 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…